On 14:45-20230417, Roger Quadros wrote:
[...]
> >>>  &main_pmx0 {
> >>>   main_mmc1_pins_default: main-mmc1-pins-default {
> >>> +         /* XXX: Kernel-Upstream: TODO: Upstream (pull changes) */
> >>
> >> Do we really want to sprinkle these comments in u-boot upstream?
> > 
> > I have no other means to indicate that these nodes need to get to
> > upstream kernel and when they do get into upstream kernel, what needs to
> > be dropped from u-boot.
> > 
> > I am open to suggestions here.
> > 
> >> If we are quite sure this makes to upstream kernel we might as well pull 
> >> them into
> >> u-boot as is.
> > 
> > No, that has been the reason why the entire dt mismatch occurred in the
> > first place. the subjective evaluation from various devs have been way
> > off. if it makes it to kernel.org master, only then can we claim that
> > the changes are in upstream.
> 
> In that case we do not accept any DT patches in u-boot till at least
> Acked by kernel maintainer?
My 2 cents:
Given that:
a) until the maintainer sends a tag to upstream merge, things are'nt
   really final and patches still have been dropped and/or modified (not
   typically, but have happened)
b) the delay between a tag and final merge is just a few weeks

We should hold the master tag as baseline at least till things settle
down, prior to relaxing rules to what is reasonable.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 
849D 1736 249D

Reply via email to