On 4/20/23 00:40, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,

On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 at 18:30, Heinrich Schuchardt
<[email protected]> wrote:



On 4/19/23 03:45, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,

On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 02:34, Heinrich Schuchardt
<[email protected]> wrote:

Fix pylint warnings like:

* Class inherits from object
* Missing module description
* Missing class description
* First line of comment blank
* Superfluous imports

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]>
---
   test/py/tests/test_efi_capsule/conftest.py    | 27 ++++--------
   .../test_capsule_firmware_fit.py              | 35 ++++++++--------
   .../test_capsule_firmware_signed_fit.py       | 41 ++++++++++---------
   .../test_capsule_firmware_signed_raw.py       | 38 ++++++++---------
   4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/py/tests/test_efi_capsule/conftest.py 
b/test/py/tests/test_efi_capsule/conftest.py
index 4879f2b5c2..0e5137de60 100644
--- a/test/py/tests/test_efi_capsule/conftest.py
+++ b/test/py/tests/test_efi_capsule/conftest.py
@@ -2,30 +2,21 @@
   # Copyright (c) 2020, Linaro Limited
   # Author: AKASHI Takahiro <[email protected]>

-import os
-import os.path
-import re
-from subprocess import call, check_call, check_output, CalledProcessError
-import pytest
-from capsule_defs import *
+"""Fixture for UEFI capsule test
+"""

-#
-# Fixture for UEFI capsule test
-#
+from subprocess import call, check_call, CalledProcessError
+import pytest
+from capsule_defs import CAPSULE_DATA_DIR, CAPSULE_INSTALL_DIR, EFITOOLS_PATH

   @pytest.fixture(scope='session')
   def efi_capsule_data(request, u_boot_config):
-    """Set up a file system to be used in UEFI capsule and
-       authentication test.
-
-    Args:
-        request: Pytest request object.
-        u_boot_config: U-boot configuration.
+    """Set up a file system to be used in UEFI capsule and authentication test
+    and return a ath to disk image to be used for testing

Thanks for cleaning this up. I suppose with all the rounds of review
we got tired of worrying about the style. Also this probably predates
the pylint check.

Can we please follow the style in the rest of the code? This should
have a heading line, with further notes after a blank line.


-    Return:
-        A path to disk image to be used for testing
+    request -- Pytest request object.
+    u_boot_config -- U-boot configuration.

Again the style is:

Return:
     request (pytest.Request): Request to be processed
     u_boot_config (type): U-Boot configuration

This seems to be some Google internal code style. We should stick to
PEP257 (https://peps.python.org/pep-0257/).

That doesn't really tell you much though. It is just the idea of a
docstring from 20 years ago. We need a convention for what is in the
strings, not just the strings.

The one we currently use is at least based on [1] or something like
it. I would not describe it as internal to Google. What makes you
think that? It is widely used.

For me at least, pylint asks for type information:

tools/binman/control.py:146:0: W9016: "modules, test_missing" missing
in parameter type documentation (missing-type-doc)

You should add type hints (PEP484) and use snake case (PEP8):

-def WriteEntryDocs(modules, test_missing=None):
+def write_entry_docs(modules: List[str], test_missing: str=None):

-def ListEntries(image_fname, entry_paths):
+def list_entries(image_fname: str, entry_paths: List[str]):

Best regards

Heinrich


You should be able to try that and see what you get.

Regards,
Simon

[1] https://sphinxcontrib-napoleon.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html

Reply via email to