On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 08:27:09AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > The patch to relax flag requirements was not accepted[1], so we still have > to have separate bootcommands depending on CMD_BOOTFLOW_FULL. > > The previous attempt at this did not work, since it used the wrong name > for the options. > > Fix this and change the message to mention BOOTSTD_FULL since this affects > not just the flags, but all functionality, so is more likely what the user > wants. > > Drop the useless condition on CMD_BOOTFLOW_FULL while we are here. > > [1] > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> > Fixes: a91492b6e9c ("bootstd: Provide a default command")
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
