On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 10:18:47AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > The ASUS Transformer T30 family are 2-in-1 detachable tablets > and AiO developed by ASUS that run the Android operating system > (TF600T runs Windows RT and P1801-T runs Android and Windows). > The T30 Transformers feature a 10.1-inch display (apart P1801-T), > an Nvidia Tegra 3 quad-core chip, 1/2 GB of RAM, and 16/32 GB of > storage. Transformers board derives from Nvidia Cardhu development > board. > > This patch brings support for 7 known Transformer devices: > - ASUS Transformer Prime TF201 > - ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T/TF300TG/TF300TL > - ASUS VivoTab RT TF600T (Windows RT based) > - ASUS Transformer Infinity TF700T > - ASUS Transformer AiO P1801-T > > Tested-by: Andreas Westman Dorcsak <hed...@yahoo.com> # all devices > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamo...@gmail.com> > --- > arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 7 + > arch/arm/dts/tegra30-asus-p1801-t.dts | 17 + > arch/arm/dts/tegra30-asus-tf201.dts | 9 + > arch/arm/dts/tegra30-asus-tf300t.dts | 18 + > arch/arm/dts/tegra30-asus-tf300tg.dts | 9 + > arch/arm/dts/tegra30-asus-tf300tl.dts | 9 + > arch/arm/dts/tegra30-asus-tf600t.dts | 89 +++++ > arch/arm/dts/tegra30-asus-tf700t.dts | 13 + > arch/arm/dts/tegra30-asus-transformer.dtsi | 211 ++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra30/Kconfig | 5 + > board/asus/transformer-t30/Kconfig | 23 ++ > board/asus/transformer-t30/MAINTAINERS | 6 + > board/asus/transformer-t30/Makefile | 11 + > .../pinmux-config-transformer.h | 365 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../transformer-t30/transformer-t30-spl.c | 41 ++ > board/asus/transformer-t30/transformer-t30.c | 201 ++++++++++ > configs/p1801-t.config | 2 + > configs/tf201.config | 2 + > configs/tf300t.config | 2 + > configs/tf300tg.config | 2 + > configs/tf300tl.config | 2 + > configs/tf600t.config | 4 + > configs/tf700t.config | 2 + > configs/transformer_t30_defconfig | 85 ++++
Sorry for not noticing this part sooner. Looking in the kernel,
arch/{riscv,powerpc}/Makefile both provide examples of how to automate
generating the resulting defconfigs directly. I think we really want
that, and also the config fragments need to be listed in the MAINTAINERS
file.
I also worry that none of these other configs will be caught by buildmn
and so won't be in CI at all, just the base. Which isn't a big problem,
yet, but could be as more people use config fragments. I'm just noting
this secondary part and not saying you need to fix that as well.
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
