Hi Jan, On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 12:09, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15.06.23 12:55, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Jan, > > > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 11:26, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On 12.06.23 23:17, Simon Glass wrote: > >>> Hi Jan, > >>> > >>> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 15:39, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> From: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> Introduce BINMAN_EXTRA_ARGS that can be set per board, e.g., to inject > >>>> specific settings. Will be used by IOT2050 first to define multiple > >>>> of-lists. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> > >>>> --- > >>>> CC: Simon Glass <[email protected]> > >>>> --- > >>>> Makefile | 1 + > >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >>> > >>> I'm really not keen on this, since it means that the Makefile (or some > >>> vars it sets) are again involved in controlling the image generation. > >>> It should really all be in the binman image description / .dtsi file > >> > >> binman does not allow me to unrole of-list inside the dts file, does it? > >> With such a feature, I wouldn't need any custom -a of-list-X switches > >> and, thus, no such EXTRA_ARGS. > > > > Can you explain a bit more about what you mean by 'unrole'? It is just > > software, so anything should be possible. > > To use a DT sequence, I need to specify fit,ftd-list. But I can say > > fit,ftd-list = "first.dtb second.dtb" > > I rather need to go via the EntryArg indirection of the binman command line.
Do you mean you would rather not use '-a CONFIG_OF_LIST'. Or are you wanting to filter that list based on something else? I'm afraid I am really not following this at all. Regards, Simon
