On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 03:01:28PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 2:14 PM Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
> 
> > One thing I would say is that the bootph changes can go to the upstream
> > kernel dts files, so that they aren't lost in the future, and we can
> 
> Are you sure? I don't see bootph devicetree properties being supported
> in 6.5-rc1.

$ git grep -l bootph arch/arm64/
arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-clk-ccf.dtsi
arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-sm-k26-revA.dts
arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi
$ git describe HEAD
v6.5-rc1-6-g3f01e9fed845

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to