On 7/16/23 03:05, Jonas Karlman wrote:
On 2023-07-16 02:58, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 7/16/23 01:10, Jonas Karlman wrote:
The current error check for device_find_first_child is not working as
expected, the documentation for device_find_first_child mention:

    @devp: Returns first child device, or NULL if none
    Return: 0

Change to return early when there is no child node to avoid any possible
null pointer dereference.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <[email protected]>
---
v2:
- Update commit message

   drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-generic.c | 6 +++---
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-generic.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-generic.c
index 35e4b36a695e..4d5d500aefab 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-generic.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-generic.c
@@ -558,9 +558,9 @@ int dwc3_glue_probe(struct udevice *dev)
                        return ret;
        }
- ret = device_find_first_child(dev, &child);
-       if (ret)
-               return ret;
+       device_find_first_child(dev, &child);
+       if (!child)
+               return 0;

What does device_find_first_child() return in your case ? ENODEV or ENOSYS ?

device_find_first_child always returns 0, same as is documented.

See 
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/drivers/core/device.c#L931-941

Ah, I see, thanks for clarifying.

Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>

Could you fix mtu3_plat.c the same way and switch this function to return void ? (separate series for these two things please)

Reply via email to