On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 04:02:44 -0500 Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> so commit 8aba9dc is not something made for fun, but to fix real bugs people > were seeing while building with bi-endian toolchains > (arm/superh/mips/probably > others), or bi-abi toolchains (blackfin/arm/probably others). Sure. But it had a side effect, and this patch is an attempt to fix that side effect without affecting the real purpose of 8aba9dc. > > This included anything that cpu/board code added to LDFLAGS -- some > > architectures added --gc-sections, x86 added --cref, etc. Since the above > > flags are added to LDFLAGS, rather than replacing them, these flags got > > used in the final link. > > > > Commit 8aba9dc introduces LDFLAGS_u-boot, so that LDFLAGS is no longer the > > source for the flags for the final link. It generates LDFLAGS_u-boot using > > PLATFORM_LDFLAGS, not LDFLAGS. It converts most of the board/cpu updates > > to LDFLAGS into LDFLAGS_u-boot, but it missed --cref. > > err, i dont think this is correct. LDFLAGS is no longer the *only* source > for > the final link. if you look at the actual target, you'll see it using > $(LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS_$(@F)). Ah. So why is PLATFORM_LDFLAGS added into both LDFLAGS and LDFLAGS_u-boot? :-P -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
