Hello Michael, Am Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 03:49:45PM +0200 schrieb Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi: > Hi > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 3:03 PM Alexander Dahl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Adapt behaviour to Linux kernel driver. > > > > The return value of gpio_request_by_name_nodev() was not checked before, > > and thus in case 'rb-gpios' was missing in DT, rb.type was set to > > ATMEL_NAND_GPIO_RB nevertheless, leading to output like this for > > example (on sam9x60-curiosity with the line removed from dts): > > > > NAND: Could not find valid ONFI parameter page; aborting > > device found, Manufacturer ID: 0xc2, Chip ID: 0xdc > > Macronix NAND 512MiB 3,3V 8-bit > > 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 256 KiB, page size: 4096, OOB size: 64 > > atmel-nand-controller nand-controller: NAND scan failed: -22 > > Failed to probe nand driver (err = -22) > > Failed to initialize NAND controller. (error -22) > > 0 MiB > > > > Note: not having that gpio assigned in dts is fine, the driver does not > > override nand_chip->dev_ready() then and a generic solution is used. > > > > Fixes: 6a8dfd57220d ("nand: atmel: Add DM based NAND driver") > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c | 11 +++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c > > b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c > > index 2b29c8def6..8e745a5111 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/nand-controller.c > > @@ -1600,10 +1600,13 @@ static struct atmel_nand *atmel_nand_create(struct > > atmel_nand_controller *nc, > > nand->cs[i].rb.type = ATMEL_NAND_NATIVE_RB; > > nand->cs[i].rb.id = val; > > } else { > > - gpio_request_by_name_nodev(np, "rb-gpios", 0, > > - &nand->cs[i].rb.gpio, > > - GPIOD_IS_IN); > > - nand->cs[i].rb.type = ATMEL_NAND_GPIO_RB; > > + ret = gpio_request_by_name_nodev(np, "rb-gpios", 0, > > + > > &nand->cs[i].rb.gpio, > > + GPIOD_IS_IN); > > + if (ret) > > + dev_err(nc->dev, "Failed to get R/B gpio > > (err = %d)\n", ret); > > Should not then an error here
Different log level or no message at all? Note: Linux prints the same message with error level in that case. Greets Alex > > Michael > > > + else > > + nand->cs[i].rb.type = ATMEL_NAND_GPIO_RB; > > } > > > > gpio_request_by_name_nodev(np, "cs-gpios", 0, > > -- > > 2.30.2 > > > > > -- > Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer > M. +39 347 913 2170 > [email protected] > __________________________________ > > Amarula Solutions BV > Joop Geesinkweg 125, 1114 AB, Amsterdam, NL > T. +31 (0)85 111 9172 > [email protected] > www.amarulasolutions.com
