Hello Nishanth, On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:10:57AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 13:19-20230824, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:08:49AM +0200, Emanuele Ghidoli wrote: > > > From: Emanuele Ghidoli <[email protected]> > > > > > > Add update_tiboot3, update_tispl and update_uboot wrappers to update > > > R5 SPL, A53 SPL and A53 U-boot respectively. > > > > > > Usage example: > > > > tftpboot ${loadaddr} tiboot3-am62x-gp-verdin.bin > > > > run update_tiboot3 > > > > > > > tftpboot ${loadaddr} tispl.bin > > > > run update_tispl > > > > > > > tftpboot ${loadaddr} u-boot.img > > > > run update_uboot > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emanuele Ghidoli <[email protected]> > > > > Acked-by: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]> > > Should you update documentation to indicate the usage?
Yeah, probably we could add it. I would not remove the existing direct command usage since this is adding just env variables that could be removed from the env even at runtime. In general the reason for these commands is that our users are accustomed to have a "guided" way to update u-boot without having to dig into the documentation. They are just convenient. Marcel: what do you think? Francesco
