On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Alexander Holler <hol...@ahsoftware.de> wrote: > Am 03.03.2011 00:48, schrieb Robert Nelson: >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Alexander Holler<hol...@ahsoftware.de> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Jason, >>> >>> Am 02.03.2011 21:26, schrieb Jason Kridner: >>>> >>>> For backwards compatibility the use of boot.scr is still supported. >>>> >>> >>> Sorry, but I think that line in the description should get removed too. >>> >> >> So, just a thought.. Are you guys planning to push this same boot >> method to all the other "omap" devices that just finally got boot.scr >> boot support by default in u-boot? It also seems's like it'll end up >> be the FAQ of the month for the beagleboard group.. ;) > > I would say that should be decided by every board-maintainer, just like the > change from ttyS2 to ttyO2. E.g. I don't think the devkit8000-sdk will > change as soon as the stuff the for the beagleboard.
Oh, we will work around it over the transition, so it's not a big deal.. It was just kinda nice, (if we assume all boards have xlo/u-boot in nand) that most boards would boot on one boot.scr/kernel/rootfs combination. Since the mainline kernel can boot on all omap2/3/4 boards (in mainline) at this point.. But since both the xM/Panda don't have nand, my point's kinda moot as they'll need a different xlo/u-boot... Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot