On 19:14-20231002, Roger Quadros wrote: [...] > > Please see suggestion by Massimo here > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cac928hy2rzoz6l8za+l20gasbjcbyoe+k75l_n3ae-78smn...@mail.gmail.com/ > > Do you agree we should change this series to use bootph-some-ram instead?
Actually I dont like usage of bootph-some-ram as a hack. We dont have any DDR in the initial stages of R5 SPL. I'd rather stick with bootph-all and pre-ram which is accurate for the staged boot sequence we are following. Further, boot-ph-all and pre-ram is already the direction we are moving in kernel dts to make syncs easier in the future. unless there is a strong reasoning on an alternate rationale, i'd rather not mess with the flow in play already. Personally though, I am miffed at a breaking change of this form :( -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
