On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 05:12:27PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:

> This code is normally compiled for sifive, but sandbox can also compile
> it. We should not use UNIT_TEST as a synonym for SANDBOX, since it is
> possible to disable UNIT_TEST for sandbox.
> 
> Correct the condition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> (no changes since v1)
> 
>  include/k210/pll.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/k210/pll.h b/include/k210/pll.h
> index fd16a89cb203..6dd60b2eb4fc 100644
> --- a/include/k210/pll.h
> +++ b/include/k210/pll.h
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ struct k210_pll_config {
>       u8 od;
>  };
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_UNIT_TEST
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SANDBOX
>  TEST_STATIC int k210_pll_calc_config(u32 rate, u32 rate_in,
>                                    struct k210_pll_config *best);
>  #ifndef nop

Sean just explained that this is wrong.

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to