On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:34:16AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > > > On 10/13/23 17:15, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:11:04AM -0400, Da Xue wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 7:47 AM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 10/13/23 06:53, Venkatesh Yadav Abbarapu wrote: > > > > > The xhci host controller driver trying to queue the URB's and it is > > > > > getting halted at the endpoint, thereby hitting the BUG_ON's. > > > > > Mostly these kind of random issues are seen on faulty boards. > > > > > Removing these BUG_ON's from the U-Boot xhci code, as in Linux kernel > > > > > xhci code BUG_ON/BUG's are removed entirely. > > > > > Please also note, that BUG_ON() is not recommended any more in the > > > > > Linux > > > > > kernel. > > > > > Similar issue has been observed on TI AM437x board and they created a > > > > > patch > > > > > in Linux kernel as below > > > > > https://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-usb/patch/1390250711-25840-1-git-send-email-ba...@ti.com/ > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Yadav Abbarapu <venkatesh.abbar...@amd.com> > > > > > > > > I already explained to Xilinx how to sync the driver with Linux and why > > > > this is needed to move forward, multiple times, and even provided a > > > > script which does most of the work automatically, since it is basically > > > > automated process. Xilinx did not even bother to test the script and > > > > provide any feedback. > > > > > > > > Until that happens, this patch is rejected. > > > > > > This patch also causes all of the USB devices on certain platforms to > > > not be detected: > > > > > > scanning bus usb@c9000000 for devices... Device not responding to set > > > address. > > > > > > USB device not accepting new address (error=80000000) > > > > Yes, we are stuck at the impasse where the custodian is asking for > > someone to try and do the re-sync, and everyone else will assist with > > testing on other platforms, but the re-sync hasn't happened. Can we > > please get someone from AMD to attempt the re-sync? > > I would like to say that we have someone to do it. But I simply don't have > that person.
That is the big problem we face, yes. Eugen, I think you said you were going to try and find time to do a re-sync, did you end up getting any? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
