On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:26:16PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > Hi Tom,
> The following changes since commit e29b932aa07fa0226d325b35d96cd4eea0370129: > > Merge branch '2023-09-30-Kconfig-updates' into next (2023-10-01 11:54:31 > -0400) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-tpm/ tags/tpm-next-27102023 > > for you to fetch changes up to 4fd7d27ccb763ce8b836a0e4c5dd005392d38e18: > > test/py: always use autostart on tpm2 selftests (2023-10-27 13:17:21 +0300) > > The pipeline > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-tpm/-/pipelines/18327 > showed had no red lights. Heinrich, I see that the docs job passed. But I see: +++ b/doc/usage/measured_boot.rst @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ + +Measured Boot +===================== And was expecting htmldocs to complain and fail. It does neither (and did neither locally which I believe is a regression in the doc building side of things. > Heinrich I did not ignore your reports and I agree with both of your > observations. The doc needs to mention EFI and the DT Kconfig options > can be squashed in the future. However this is a big patchset with > a time consuming test procedure. The changes you requested are > trivial and we can send them later. I hope that's fine. > > Simon there's one patch you haven't acked/reviewed yet, but I've > responded to your concerns in the ML. > The response is here > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/cac_iwjjl_takwwei4kancnq6dsg1v5+4hmsvtifcdr_ach-...@mail.gmail.com/ > Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature