>On Tuesday, March 15, 2011 22:53:20 Shaohui Xie wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>> /*
>> * SPI flash interface
>> + * Add support for Freescale eSPI controller
>
>this is not the place for changelogs
[Xie Shaohui] OK, I'll drop this.
>
>> @@ -30,6 +32,7 @@ static int spi_flash_read_write(struct spi_slave *spi,
>> unsigned long flags = SPI_XFER_BEGIN;
>> int ret;
>>
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_FSL_ESPI
>> if (data_len == 0)
>> flags |= SPI_XFER_END;
>>
>> @@ -43,6 +46,48 @@ static int spi_flash_read_write(struct spi_slave *spi,
>> debug("SF: Failed to transfer %zu bytes of data: %d\n",
>> data_len, ret);
>> }
>> +#else
>> + struct espi_transfer transfer[1];
>> + unsigned char *buffer;
>> + size_t buf_len;
>> +
>> + if (data_in == NULL)
>> + buf_len = cmd_len;
>> + else
>> + buf_len = 2 * cmd_len;
>> +
>> + buffer = (unsigned char *)malloc(data_len + buf_len);
>> + if (!buffer) {
>> + debug("SF: Failed to malloc memory.\n");
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + memcpy(buffer, cmd, cmd_len);
>> + if (data_in == NULL)
>> + memcpy(buffer + cmd_len, data_out, data_len);
>> +
>> + transfer[0].cmd_len = cmd_len;
>> + transfer[0].data_len = data_len;
>> + transfer[0].tx_buf = buffer;
>> + if (data_in == NULL)
>> + transfer[0].rx_buf = NULL;
>> + else
>> + transfer[0].rx_buf = buffer + cmd_len;
>> +
>> + transfer[0].flags = flags | SPI_XFER_END;
>> +
>> + spi->transfer = &transfer[0];
>> + ret = spi_xfer(spi, 0, NULL, NULL, 0);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + debug("SF: Failed to send command %02x: %d\n", cmd, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (data_in)
>> + memcpy(data_in, transfer[0].rx_buf + cmd_len, data_len);
>> +
>> + free(buffer);
>> +#endif
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>
>yikes, this cant be right
[Xie Shaohui] Could you shed more light on this, I didn't get your point, I
guess It's maybe the behavior the transaction being handled, for espi
controller, software cannot control the chip selects directly, software need to
tell the controller how long the CS signal need to be asserted. Driver need to
combine the CMD and data together in one transaction, it cannot call spi_xfer
two times, first for CMD, and second for data.
If this is the reason you thought it was wrong, do you have better idea to
handle this kind of Espi controller?
Best Regards,
Shaohui Xie
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
