On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 01:52:16PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 10:00-20231113, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
> > Move esm-k3.txt to ti,j721e-esm.yaml in line with the devicetree
> > documentation in kernel.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-fran...@ti.com>
> > ---
> >  doc/device-tree-bindings/misc/esm-k3.txt      | 25 ---------
> >  .../misc/ti,j721e-esm.yaml                    | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
> 
> What is the rule here?
> https://tgit.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/ti,j721e-esm.yaml
> we have the binding in upstream kernel.

Not to cause anyone undue worry but part of me wants to just
submodule/subtree
https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/tree/main/dtschema/schemas
as that looks like Rob syncs it with the kernel periodically and since
in turn we're working with Rob to upstream our unique bindings there
here and not there list should be shrinking, not growing. Since we say
"use the kernel device trees" and we don't have the validation make
targets, the content of the copies of the schema in our trees is more of
a promise that it's true than used anywhere. So perhaps it would be
better if something was written down to that effect.

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to