On 1/23/24 18:58, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 08:53:21AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:


On 1/22/24 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
Now that we support having CONFIG_SYS_CONFIG_NAME be unset to indicate a
lack of board.h file, unset this on the xilinx_mbv platforms and remove
the otherwise empty file.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
---
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
---
   board/xilinx/mbv/Kconfig     | 3 ---
   board/xilinx/mbv/MAINTAINERS | 1 -
   include/configs/xilinx_mbv.h | 6 ------
   3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
   delete mode 100644 include/configs/xilinx_mbv.h

diff --git a/board/xilinx/mbv/Kconfig b/board/xilinx/mbv/Kconfig
index 4bc9f72c541b..d2dec397ed6f 100644
--- a/board/xilinx/mbv/Kconfig
+++ b/board/xilinx/mbv/Kconfig
@@ -9,9 +9,6 @@ config SYS_VENDOR
   config SYS_CPU
        default "generic"
-config SYS_CONFIG_NAME
-       default "xilinx_mbv"
-
   config TEXT_BASE
        default 0x80000000 if !RISCV_SMODE
        default 0x80400000 if RISCV_SMODE && ARCH_RV32I
diff --git a/board/xilinx/mbv/MAINTAINERS b/board/xilinx/mbv/MAINTAINERS
index 445654fe740e..db9f03388df9 100644
--- a/board/xilinx/mbv/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/board/xilinx/mbv/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4,4 +4,3 @@ S:      Maintained
   F:   arch/riscv/dts/xilinx-mbv*
   F:   board/xilinx/mbv/
   F:   configs/xilinx_mbv*
-F:     include/configs/xilinx_mbv.h
diff --git a/include/configs/xilinx_mbv.h b/include/configs/xilinx_mbv.h
deleted file mode 100644
index dba398aeec49..000000000000
--- a/include/configs/xilinx_mbv.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
-/*
- * (C) Copyright 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
- *
- * Michal Simek <[email protected]>
- */

Acked-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]>

But maybe in future we need to revert this patch to add more options there.
Or do you plan to remove all of these configs?
I can imagine distro boot wiring but that can be done via vars file only but
it is not practical.

Do you mean that plain text environment feels impractical for standard
boot (which should be used instead of the pure scripts of distro_boot) ?

I didn't play with standard boot yet to find out how to prioritize certain devices at run time. But normally we are trying to keep all amd platforms in sync to make sure that from user perspective doesn't really matter if you are on microblaze, arm32, arm64 or risc-v based platform.

There are still a lot of configs like GUIDs, dfu and others that I don't think we will end up without these config files anytime soon. But it doesn't mean we shouldn't aim for it.

Thanks,
Michal





Reply via email to