On 2/26/24 11:43 AM, Sumit Garg wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 14:24, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2/26/24 9:04 AM, Sumit Garg wrote:
[...]
+static int imx7_reset_assert_imx8mp(struct reset_ctl *rst)
Linux calls those imx8mp_reset_set() can co. which is less confusing
than imx7...imx8mp() , use it.
IMO, it would be more confusing if we choose two different naming
patterns for the same driver, see existing function names
imx7_reset_{deassert/assert}_imx* pattern.
Maybe create a patch which updates the naming scheme ?
Using two SoC names in one function name is confusing I think .
In fact, why not copy the code from Linux outright ?
I suppose the question here is to not convert the driver to use
regmap, right? If it is then that should be done as a separate cleanup
patch.
If it isn't too hard, please do the clean up first and then add the
MX8MP bits on top.
[...]
