On 11.04.24 05:13, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 2/16/24 11:35, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
If multiple messages are written, line-feeds improve the readability.

Fixes: c40b6df87fc0 ("clk: Add SiFive FU540 PRCI clock driver")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com>
---
  drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c b/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c
index a3cb109d357..537c696b727 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static int __wrpll_calc_filter_range(unsigned long post_divr_freq)
  {
      if (post_divr_freq < MIN_POST_DIVR_FREQ ||
          post_divr_freq > MAX_POST_DIVR_FREQ) {
-        WARN(1, "%s: post-divider reference freq out of range: %lu",
+        WARN(1, "%s: post-divider reference freq out of range: %lu\n",
               __func__, post_divr_freq);
          return -ERANGE;
      }
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ int wrpll_configure_for_rate(struct wrpll_cfg *c, u32 target_rate,
      int range;
      if (c->flags == 0) {
-        WARN(1, "%s called with uninitialized PLL config", __func__);
+        WARN(1, "%s called with uninitialized PLL config\n", __func__);
          return -EINVAL;
      }
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ unsigned long wrpll_calc_output_rate(const struct wrpll_cfg *c,
      u64 n;
      if (c->flags & WRPLL_FLAGS_EXT_FEEDBACK_MASK) {
-        WARN(1, "external feedback mode not yet supported");
+        WARN(1, "external feedback mode not yet supported\n");
          return ULONG_MAX;
      }

Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com>

But maybe these should be dev_dbg?

The messages look like indicating misconfiguration. So the user should see these.

The kernel code also uses WARN() (and also lacks the line-feeds).

CCing Paul as the Linux maintainer and author.

Best regards

Heinrich

Reply via email to