Il 19/04/2011 16:15, Detlev Zundel ha scritto:
> Hi Luca,
>
>> This is needed for the upcoming TFTP server implementation.
>>
>> This also simplifies PingHandler() and fixes rxhand_f documentation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli<luca.ceres...@comelit.it>
>> Cc: Wolfgang Denk<w...@denx.de>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>>   - fixed checkpatch issues.
>>
>>   drivers/net/netconsole.c |    5 +++--
>>   include/net.h            |   15 ++++++++++-----
>>   net/bootp.c              |    9 ++++++---
>>   net/dns.c                |    2 +-
>>   net/net.c                |   30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>>   net/nfs.c                |    2 +-
>>   net/rarp.c               |    3 ++-
>>   net/sntp.c               |    3 ++-
>>   net/tftp.c               |    3 ++-
>>   9 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/net/net.c b/net/net.c
>> index a609632..132f99b 100644
>> --- a/net/net.c
>> +++ b/net/net.c
> [...]
>
>> @@ -1596,11 +1598,12 @@ NetReceive(volatile uchar * inpkt, int len)
>>                               *      IP header OK.  Pass the packet to the 
>> current handler.
>>                               */
>>                              /* XXX point to ip packet */
>> -                            (*packetHandler)((uchar *)ip, 0, 0, 0);
>> +                            (*packetHandler)((uchar *)ip, 0, src_ip, 0, 0);
>>                              return;
>>                      case ICMP_ECHO_REQUEST:
>> -                            debug("Got ICMP ECHO REQUEST, return %d bytes 
>> \n",
>> -                                    ETHER_HDR_SIZE + len);
>> +                            debug("Got ICMP ECHO REQUEST, "
>> +                                  "return %d bytes\n",
>> +                                  ETHER_HDR_SIZE + len);
>>
>>                              memcpy (&et->et_dest[0],&et->et_src[0], 6);
>>                              memcpy (&et->et_src[ 0], NetOurEther, 6);
> This second hunk is not related to the patch at hand, so strictly
> speaking it should not be in here.  It's not enough to NAK the patch
> however, just something to look out for in the future.

Yep, but it's needed for checkpatch compliance.

Luca


_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to