Am 12. August 2024 09:58:28 MESZ schrieb Ilias Apalodimas 
<[email protected]>:
>On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 at 17:52, Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Show the vendor name so it is clear which firmware is being used, e.g.
>> whether U-Boot is providing the boot services.

I never had any doubt about which firmware I am using.

Originally you expected "U-Boot" to be printed on any device as indication of 
the copyright.

Why is this patch needed? Are you checking the output anywhere?


>>
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> (no changes since v2)
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Reword commit message
>> - Use 'Firmware vendor' instead of just 'Vendor'
>>
>>  lib/efi_loader/helloworld.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/helloworld.c b/lib/efi_loader/helloworld.c
>> index 586177de0c8..c4d2afcb40a 100644
>> --- a/lib/efi_loader/helloworld.c
>> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/helloworld.c
>> @@ -237,6 +237,9 @@ efi_status_t EFIAPI efi_main(efi_handle_t handle,
>>                         (con_out, u"Missing device path for device 
>> handle\r\n");
>>                 goto out;
>>         }
>> +       con_out->output_string(con_out, u"Firmware vendor: ");
>> +       con_out->output_string(con_out, systab->fw_vendor);
>> +       con_out->output_string(con_out, u"\n");

How about FirmwareRevision"?

Best regards

Heinrich

>>         con_out->output_string(con_out, u"Boot device: ");
>>         ret = print_device_path(device_path, device_path_to_text);
>>         if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]>

Reply via email to