On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 03:06:31PM +0000, Gaskell, Oliver wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2024 3:52 PM
> > To: Gaskell, Oliver <oliver.gask...@analog.com>
> > Cc: Nathan Barrett-Morrison <nathan.morri...@timesys.com>; Greg Malysa
> > <greg.mal...@timesys.com>; Ian Roberts <ian.robe...@timesys.com>;
> > Bimpikas, Vasileios <vasileios.bimpi...@analog.com>; Agarwal, Utsav
> > <utsav.agar...@analog.com>; Artamonovs, Arturs
> > <arturs.artamon...@analog.com>; Rayagonda Kokatanur
> > <rayagonda.kokata...@broadcom.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Linux Factory
> > <adsp-li...@analog.com>; Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] arm: Initial support for Analog Devices SC5xx
> > boards
> >
> > [External]
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:02:08AM +0100, Oliver Gaskell via B4 Relay
> > wrote:
> > > ADSP-SC5xx is a series of ARM-based DSPs.
> > > This comprises the armv7 based SC57x, SC58x and SC594 series, and the
> > > armv8 based SC598.
> > >
> > > This patch series includes configurations, init code, and minimal DTs
> > > to enable Analog Devices' evaluation boards for these SoCs to boot
> > > through SPL and into U-Boot Proper, as well as devicetree schemas for
> > > the added DTs.
> > >
> > > This patch series depends on ("arm: Add Analog Devices SC5xx Machine
> > > Type") (https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2024-April/552043.html)
> >
> > Since that series has been merged since early May, what is this series
> > based on top of? It should be based on top of current (or close enough
> > to not matter) -next. Also, has everything been passed through
> > checkpatch.pl and the results looked at? Thanks.
>
> I made it on top of -rc1, just tested and I think it applies cleanly
> to -rc3 and next. Wasn't sure on the policy re. patch series dependencies
> so just wanted to be 100% sure that was clear.
>
> It has been run through checkpatch, there's a few warnings that I think
> are OK. Only warning I missed is about the Co-developed-by tags not
> having matching Signed-off-by tags - if this is an issue I can make a v2
> that fixes this.OK, thanks for elaborating. I forget, what is the plan to upstream these dts files? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
