On May 3, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > On May 3, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Kumar Gala <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>> + >>> + ft_verify_fdt(*of_flat_tree); >> >> Do we not want to error out here if verify fails? > > Maybe. I didn't want a false negative to prevent booting. If the DT is > wrong, the kernel won't display any messages, so the warning will be the last > thing the user sees anyway. > > If the consensus is that failure should abort, then I can add that. I don't > have a strong preference either way. >>
I would think that a verify of this form should be considered as bad as not passing a checksum verification. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
