On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 01:59:00PM +0000, Bimpikas, Vasileios wrote:
> > From: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
> > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2024 6:31 PM
> > To: zzzzGaskell, zzzzOliver <oliver.gask...@analog.com>
> > Cc: Nathan Barrett-Morrison <nathan.morri...@timesys.com>; Greg Malysa
> > <greg.mal...@timesys.com>; Ian Roberts <ian.robe...@timesys.com>;
> > Bimpikas, Vasileios <vasileios.bimpi...@analog.com>; Agarwal, Utsav
> > <utsav.agar...@analog.com>; Artamonovs, Arturs
> > <arturs.artamon...@analog.com>; Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>; Heiko
> > Schocher <h...@denx.de>; Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com>; Ramon
> > Fried <rfried....@gmail.com>; Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>; Jagan Teki
> > <ja...@amarulasolutions.com>; Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com>; Jaehoon
> > Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Linux Factory
> > <adsp-li...@analog.com>; 20240828-sc5xx-upstreaming-patches-v1-0-
> > 44d9adfdf...@analog.com; Angelo Dureghello
> > <angelo.dureghe...@timesys.com>; Piotr Wojtaszczyk
> > <piotr.wojtaszc...@timesys.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] drivers: Driver support for ADI SC5xx SoCs
> > 
> > Please rebase this on top of current master, thanks. Also check that each 
> > patch
> > is only doing the correct MAINTAINERS change, that's where trying to apply
> > this by hand failed for me.
> > 
> > --
> > Tom
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Thanks for this. I've rebased and resolved a single conflict. I could not 
> find any
> MAINTAINERS issue after rebasing & building. So just before sending my
> changes, I wanted to confirm if I'm missing something regarding
> your remark about MAINTAINERS.

As long as the series applies cleanly to top of tree, you're fine,
thanks.

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to