Hi Tom, Devarsh, Quentin

On 14-Oct-24 11:53 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 07:23:09PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi all,

On 10/14/24 5:35 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:59:39PM +0530, Devarsh Thakkar wrote:
Hi,

On 14/10/24 19:57, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:10:43AM +0530, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
Hi Andrew

On 11/10/24 01:59, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 10/10/24 1:50 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Neha,

On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 01:09, Neha Malcom Francis <[email protected]> wrote:

The message "DRAM:  2 GiB (effective 32 GiB)" can be a little confusing,
modify the message to show exactly what is meant:

"DRAM:  2 GiB (available for U-Boot out of total 32 GiB)"

Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <[email protected]>
---
    common/board_f.c | 2 +-
    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/common/board_f.c b/common/board_f.c
index 154675d0e40..b7add8f7d3d 100644
--- a/common/board_f.c
+++ b/common/board_f.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static int show_dram_config(void)

           print_size(gd->ram_size, "");
           if (!sizes_near(gd->ram_size, size)) {
-               printf(" (effective ");
+               printf(" (available for U-Boot out of total ");
                   print_size(size, ")");
           }
           board_add_ram_info(0);
--
2.34.1


I've forgotten why the first number can be so much lower than the
second. What is causing that?

This is quite a long string...could we say "(total 32 GiB)" ? Then
perhaps add something to doc/ to talk about the banner that U-Boot
prints?


Why not just only print the total number? The amount available to
U-Boot seems like an internal detail, I'd guess most folks just what
to see at a glance how much DDR was detected on their system.


Knowing how much u-boot is using might help someone who is working on some
memory map related stuff or if they want to stop at u-boot prompt and tweak
environment variables related to memory map (e.g. load address for kernel,
dtb, load bitmap to DDR etc). Overall I personally don't see much harm on
keeping both the information (DDR available to u-boot and total available
DDR). If the word effective is confusing than the print can be made more
verbose as being intended in this patch-set or by following the suggestions
given by Simon and Udit.

U-Boot isn't "using" 2GiB however. And in fact the command Simon is
working on to dump the memory table and what's where, as far as U-Boot
knows, would be helpful in that case.


"Available" and "Total" would be matching the terms used by "free" in Linux
for example.

I still think both are valuable pieces of information (what's populated and
what is usable by U-Boot AFAIR).

Yes, and that won't change the binary size much, thanks.


Thank you for the inputs. I think we can go with s/effective/total and updating the documentation.

--
Thanking You
Neha Malcom Francis

Reply via email to