Dear Igor Grinberg,
In message <4dc0ffb0.5080...@compulab.co.il> you wrote:
>
> While looking at how to document the CONFIG_MACH_TYPE variable,
> I caught myself wondering, why don't we provide an option to set
> this variable in board config file and set the bi_arch_number field in
> a more generic location (e.g. arch/arm/lib/board.c: board_init_f()),
> then it is right now (in each board's board_init() function)?
"Historic reasons", probably.
> Will such thing be accepted?
Why not.
> Are there any problems with it?
>
> Have anyone tried this in the past?
Not that I know of.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
What about WRITING it first and rationalizing it afterwords? :-)
- Larry Wall in <8...@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
