On 05/10/2011 07:39 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
> Hi, Stefano,
> 

Hi Jason,

> 2011/4/27 Stefano Babic <[email protected]>:
>> On 04/27/2011 11:39 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
>>
>>> Then why not rename the driver to something else than "fsl_pmic"?  Maybe
>>> this is what Jason really is asking?
>>
>> Yes, of course, no problem at all. Jason, if you meant to drop the fsl_
>> to make the driver more general, I completely agree. Sorry, I have not
>> got the point.
> 
> Sorry for the late response due to some reason. :(

No problem at all.

> 
> Yes, We had better rename fsl_ to something else, I would like use 
> generic_pmic
> or something else, what's your idea?

I am open for new names. Probably we should state that this driver is a
wrapper when SPI or I2C is used, and something like spi_i2c_pmic gives a
better idea. With generic_pmic we could think there is a general layout
for PMICs (and it is not true).

Best regards,
Stefano Babic

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: [email protected]
=====================================================================
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to