Fix missed rename from SPI_ADVANCE to SPI_STACKED_PARALLEL. This fixes an issue encountered while testing the Zynq-7000 QSPI parallel Flash implementation.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Wernberger <[email protected]> --- drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c b/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c index 36b7d383aa..d604975374 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ int _spi_get_bus_and_cs(int busnum, int cs, int speed, int mode, slave = dev_get_parent_priv(dev); bus_data = dev_get_uclass_priv(bus); -#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SPI_ADVANCE) +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SPI_STACKED_PARALLEL) if ((dev_read_bool(dev, "parallel-memories")) && !slave->multi_cs_cap) { dev_err(dev, "controller doesn't support multi CS\n"); return -EINVAL; @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ int spi_slave_of_to_plat(struct udevice *dev, struct dm_spi_slave_plat *plat) int mode = 0; int value; -#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SPI_ADVANCE) +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SPI_STACKED_PARALLEL) int ret; ret = dev_read_u32_array(dev, "reg", plat->cs, SPI_CS_CNT_MAX); -- 2.34.1 --- Another approach to get the commit message right. In case there are still some issues feel free to fix them up. I'm obviously not yet used to the Linux mailing list which will hopefully change soon. Until then I don't want to annoy you with too many mails. Thanks for your help! :) BR Dominik
