On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 05:58:12PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 15:50, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:38:15PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > At present there is a function, efi_set_bootdev(), which is used in > > > various places to tell the EFI loader which device a file came from. > > > > > > With bootstd, this information is available in the bootflow. > > > > > > This little series provides a way for bootstd to provide the bootflow to > > > the EFI loader, so that it is able to select the correct paths. > > > > > > For now only the EFI bootmeth is updated. > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > I think as a general rule it would help everyone if you had no more than > > one outstanding series per subsystem per week. This is 30 efi_loader > > patches in 24 hours and that's _a_lot_. One could easily argue that's > > too much. Thanks. > > Sure, I'm happy to send fewer patches. Could you go into a little more > detail about what 'per week' means in this context. Can you give me an > example?
Sure. No new patches, no re-spinnning patches, no re-posting patches that touch lib/efi_loader/* until next Wednesday. > This series has been sitting around since mid-October. It just didn't > get reviewed / applied. I just hit a situation where I needed PXE > booting, so I added another patch and sent a v2. Per the changelog, you also made a few other changes in here since v1 other than picking up Ilias' tag. Please also note that it's been not quite a week since you posted the 46 part "pxe" series, and that needs to be broken up in to something reviewable-sized too. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
