On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 12:10:49PM +0100, Duje Mihanović wrote: > On Friday 27 December 2024 22:53:27 Central European Standard Time Tom Rini > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 10:22:14PM +0100, Duje Mihanović wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This series adds initial support for Marvell's PXA1908 ARM64 SoC and > > > Samsung's Galaxy Core Prime VE LTE, a smartphone based on said SoC. > > > > > > On this board, U-Boot is used as a secondary bootloader to work around > > > certain quirks of the factory S-Boot. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Duje Mihanović <duje.mihano...@skole.hr> > > > > What is the status of getting these dtsi files upstream? Thanks. > > They are the last component of PXA1908 support waiting to be merged, see > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241104-pxa1908-lkml-v13-0-e050609b8...@skole.hr/ > > . > > In case you're asking this to see whether the board could use OF_UPSTREAM, I > should note that the dtsi files in this set differ from the ones waiting to > be > merged into Linux differ by being slimmed down, having different compatibles > in a few places (CPU and serial ports specifically) and the coreprimevelte > dts > also has an extra property `pxa,rev-id` which the stock bootloader requires > for booting. Could all this be handled in a `pxa1908-samsung-coreprimevelte-u- > boot.dtsi` and `pxa1908-u-boot.dtsi` once they are upstreamed?
Yes, this is about moving to OF_UPSTREAM. Strictly and only with respect to things that we have to deal with due to other bootloaders can we deal with problems like that in the -u-boot.dtsi file. Otherwise we need to match compatibles, etc, with upstream. Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
