Hi Tom, On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 at 03:44, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 11:08:46AM +1300, Simon Glass wrote: > > > The current UPL spec[1] has been tidied up and improved over the last > > year, since U-Boot's original UPL support was written. > > > > This series addresses various issues, with a goal of having U-Boot boot > > EDK2. > > > > There is still more work to do, but this series gets to the point (on > > QEMU) where the ACPI tables are required. Further work will be needed to > > relocate the tables out of the QEMU firmware-filesystem. > > > > [1] [email protected]:UniversalPayload/spec.git commit 3f1450d > > Since this is on top of your fork, and not mainline, and you aren't even > noting that in your cover letter it's probably not worth the time of > everyone you sent this to, to look at.
It applies to -next except for the QEMU script which you rejected. I can't do anything about that. So I think you may have the wrong end of the stick here. The only thing I can think of is that the UPL series depends on Raymond's bloblist patch [1]. But I was assuming that would be applied at some point and I didn't want to resend someone else's patch. I don't have it in the sjg tree either yet, as I was hoping he would write a test. In fact I would very-much like people to write tests (and docs if needed) without needing to be asked. Regards, Simon [1] https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/caflsztjsgqmk8yyybxfeafzwfhf8uhj_rnxzz7ship1-fb8...@mail.gmail.com/
