On 22.01.25 09:10, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 22.01.25 06:32, Gabriel Dalimonte wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Dalimonte <[email protected]>
---

Please, add a commit message.


  fs/fs.c      | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/fs.h | 13 +++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/fs.c b/fs/fs.c
index 99ddcc5e37..160a43c957 100644
--- a/fs/fs.c
+++ b/fs/fs.c
@@ -143,6 +143,12 @@ static inline int fs_mkdir_unsupported(const char
*dirname)
      return -1;
  }

+static inline int fs_rename_unsupported(const char *old_path,
+                    const char *new_path)
+{
+    return -1;
+}
+
  struct fstype_info {
      int fstype;
      char *name;
@@ -183,6 +189,7 @@ struct fstype_info {
      int (*unlink)(const char *filename);
      int (*mkdir)(const char *dirname);
      int (*ln)(const char *filename, const char *target);
+    int (*rename)(const char *old_path, const char *new_path);
  };

  static struct fstype_info fstypes[] = {
@@ -206,6 +213,7 @@ static struct fstype_info fstypes[] = {
          .unlink = fs_unlink_unsupported,
          .mkdir = fs_mkdir_unsupported,
  #endif
+        .rename = fs_rename_unsupported,
          .uuid = fat_uuid,
          .opendir = fat_opendir,
          .readdir = fat_readdir,
@@ -238,6 +246,7 @@ static struct fstype_info fstypes[] = {
          .closedir = ext4fs_closedir,
          .unlink = fs_unlink_unsupported,
          .mkdir = fs_mkdir_unsupported,
+        .rename = fs_rename_unsupported,
      },
  #endif
  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SANDBOX) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XPL_BUILD)
@@ -257,6 +266,7 @@ static struct fstype_info fstypes[] = {
          .unlink = fs_unlink_unsupported,
          .mkdir = fs_mkdir_unsupported,
          .ln = fs_ln_unsupported,
+        .rename = fs_rename_unsupported,
      },
  #endif
  #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SEMIHOSTING)
@@ -276,6 +286,7 @@ static struct fstype_info fstypes[] = {
          .unlink = fs_unlink_unsupported,
          .mkdir = fs_mkdir_unsupported,
          .ln = fs_ln_unsupported,
+        .rename = fs_rename_unsupported,
      },
  #endif
  #ifndef CONFIG_XPL_BUILD
@@ -296,6 +307,7 @@ static struct fstype_info fstypes[] = {
          .unlink = fs_unlink_unsupported,
          .mkdir = fs_mkdir_unsupported,
          .ln = fs_ln_unsupported,
+        .rename = fs_rename_unsupported,
      },
  #endif
  #endif
@@ -317,6 +329,7 @@ static struct fstype_info fstypes[] = {
          .unlink = fs_unlink_unsupported,
          .mkdir = fs_mkdir_unsupported,
          .ln = fs_ln_unsupported,
+        .rename = fs_rename_unsupported,
      },
  #endif
  #endif
@@ -339,6 +352,7 @@ static struct fstype_info fstypes[] = {
          .ln = fs_ln_unsupported,
          .unlink = fs_unlink_unsupported,
          .mkdir = fs_mkdir_unsupported,
+        .rename = fs_rename_unsupported,
      },
  #endif
  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_EROFS)
@@ -360,6 +374,7 @@ static struct fstype_info fstypes[] = {
          .ln = fs_ln_unsupported,
          .unlink = fs_unlink_unsupported,
          .mkdir = fs_mkdir_unsupported,
+        .rename = fs_rename_unsupported,
      },
  #endif
      {
@@ -378,6 +393,7 @@ static struct fstype_info fstypes[] = {
          .unlink = fs_unlink_unsupported,
          .mkdir = fs_mkdir_unsupported,
          .ln = fs_ln_unsupported,
+        .rename = fs_rename_unsupported,
      },
  };

@@ -713,6 +729,22 @@ int fs_ln(const char *fname, const char *target)
      return ret;
  }

+int fs_rename(const char *old_path, const char *new_path)
+{
+    struct fstype_info *info = fs_get_info(fs_type);
+    int ret;
+
+    ret = info->rename(old_path, new_path);
+
+    if (ret < 0) {
+        log_err("** Unable to rename %s -> %s **\n", old_path,
new_path);

We should not write messages by default. This will may lead to output
layout in EFI applications looking wrong.

log_debug() would be adequate.

We don't need the "** " first characters.

Otherwise the patch looks good to me.

Best regards

Heinrich

+        ret = -1;
+    }
+    fs_close();
+
+    return ret;
+}
+
  int do_size(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *const
argv[],
          int fstype)
  {
@@ -975,6 +1007,21 @@ int do_ln(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int
argc, char *const argv[],
      return 0;
  }

+int do_rename(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *const
argv[],
+          int fstype)
+{
+    if (argc != 5)
+        return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+    if (fs_set_blk_dev(argv[1], argv[2], fstype))
+        return 1;
+
+    if (fs_rename(argv[3], argv[4]))
+        return 1;
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
  int do_fs_types(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *
const argv[])
  {
      struct fstype_info *drv = fstypes;
diff --git a/include/fs.h b/include/fs.h
index 2474880385..24b121f55d 100644
--- a/include/fs.h
+++ b/include/fs.h
@@ -270,6 +270,17 @@ int fs_unlink(const char *filename);
   */
  int fs_mkdir(const char *filename);

+/**
+ * fs_rename - rename a file or directory

Shouldn't this function be called fs_move() and allow moving a file from
one directory to another?

+ *
+ * @old_path: existing path of the file/directory to rename
+ * @new_path: new path of the file/directory. If this points to an
existing
+ * file or empty directory, the existing file/directory will be
unlinked.

What happens if the directory is non-empty?

I would prefer a real move function that copies the old file to the
pre-existing target directory.

Best regards

Heinrich

+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, -1 on error conditions
+ */
+int fs_rename(const char *old_path, const char *new_path);
+
  /*
   * Common implementation for various filesystem commands, optionally
limited
   * to a specific filesystem type via the fstype parameter.
@@ -290,6 +301,8 @@ int do_mkdir(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int
argc, char *const argv[],
           int fstype);
  int do_ln(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *const
argv[],
        int fstype);
+int do_rename(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *const
argv[],
+          int fstype);

  /*
   * Determine the UUID of the specified filesystem and print it.
Optionally it is


Reply via email to