On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 05:18:21PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Yao Zi <[email protected]> schrieb am So., 2. März 2025, 17:02: > > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 03:21:18PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > Don't assume that u32 and u64 are already defined. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/include/asm/setjmp.h | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/setjmp.h > > b/arch/arm/include/asm/setjmp.h > > > index 662bec86321..9a7f5af9f8f 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/setjmp.h > > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/setjmp.h > > > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ > > > #ifndef _SETJMP_H_ > > > #define _SETJMP_H_ 1 > > > > > > +#include <asm-generic/int-ll64.h> > > > + > > > > > /* > > > * This really should be opaque, but the EFI implementation wrongly > > > * assumes that a 'struct jmp_buf_data' is defined. > > > > With PATCH 4 of the series, this comment isn't true anymore. Should we > > fix it up at the same time? > > > > The comment is removed in patch 3.
Oops, I didn't notice that. Sorry for the noise. > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/[email protected]/T/#u > > Best regards > > Heinrich Thanks, Yao Zi
