On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 01:25:27PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote: > On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 00:11, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > Add the test_net_boot.py test to the generated documentation. While most > > of this was already commented correctly for inclusion the biggest > > problem was examples of code without a code-block notation. This in turn > > broke parsing. Add the missing notations. We also must have the comment > > prior to any import lines or it will not be seen as a comment on the > > overall file and thus not included. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > > --- > > Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> > > Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > --- > > doc/develop/pytest/index.rst | 1 + > > doc/develop/pytest/test_net_boot.rst | 8 ++ > > test/py/tests/test_net_boot.py | 163 +++++++++++++++------------ > > 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 doc/develop/pytest/test_net_boot.rst > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > Can we add some default binaries to the tree, or somewhere else?
No, I don't think that's a good idea. It needs to be something that will actually boot on the hardware in question. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
