Hi Moteen,

On 5/16/25 1:41 PM, Moteen Shah wrote:
As per bootph schema, bootph-* property in child node should be
implied in their parent, but this feature is not implemented in
the U-Boot proper stage (before relocation) resulting in devices
not being bound because of the missing bootph-all or bootph-some-ram
property in the parent node.

To mitigate this issue, add a function to scan through all the nodes
in the device-tree for bootph-all and bootph-some-ram properties. If
found, propagate it to all of its parent nodes up the hierarchy.

Signed-off-by: Moteen Shah <m-s...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>


Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@cherry.de>

Thanks!
Quentin

Reply via email to