Hi, Le Mon 02 Jun 25, 01:40, Andre Przywara a écrit : > On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 17:39:43 +0200 > Paul Kocialkowski <cont...@paulk.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > > A device-tree property is already defined to indicate that the internal > > PHY should be used with active-low leds, which corresponds to a > > specific bit in the dedicated syscon register. > > > > Add support for setting this bit when the property is present. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <cont...@paulk.fr> > > --- > > drivers/net/sun8i_emac.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/sun8i_emac.c b/drivers/net/sun8i_emac.c > > index 8433e7db2654..990a184e4b1f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/sun8i_emac.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/sun8i_emac.c > > @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ struct sun8i_eth_pdata { > > u32 reset_delays[3]; > > int tx_delay_ps; > > int rx_delay_ps; > > + bool leds_active_low; > > }; > > > > static int sun8i_mdio_read(struct mii_dev *bus, int addr, int devad, int > > reg) > > @@ -287,7 +288,8 @@ static void sun8i_adjust_link(struct emac_eth_dev *priv, > > writel(v, priv->mac_reg + EMAC_CTL0); > > } > > > > -static u32 sun8i_emac_set_syscon_ephy(struct emac_eth_dev *priv, u32 reg) > > +static u32 sun8i_emac_set_syscon_ephy(struct sun8i_eth_pdata *pdata, > > + struct emac_eth_dev *priv, u32 reg) > > { > > if (priv->use_internal_phy) { > > /* H3 based SoC's that has an Internal 100MBit PHY > > @@ -295,6 +297,10 @@ static u32 sun8i_emac_set_syscon_ephy(struct > > emac_eth_dev *priv, u32 reg) > > */ > > reg &= ~H3_EPHY_DEFAULT_MASK; > > reg |= H3_EPHY_DEFAULT_VALUE; > > + > > + if (pdata->leds_active_low) > > + reg |= H3_EPHY_LED_POL; > > That might be nitpicking, since it worked before, but I wonder if we > should either explicitly clear the bit in an else branch, or follow the > recent Linux change to build the register up from scratch: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sunxi/20250423095222.1517507-1-andre.przyw...@arm.com/
Yeah I found it pretty odd that the implementation insists on read+write instead of just normally building up the register. I'll do that in the next version. And indeed with this version there would be a corner case where the bit is not cleared. Even if it's unlikely, it's not good programming. All the best, Paul > Cheers, > Andre > > > + > > reg |= priv->phyaddr << H3_EPHY_ADDR_SHIFT; > > reg &= ~H3_EPHY_SHUTDOWN; > > return reg | H3_EPHY_SELECT; > > @@ -314,7 +320,7 @@ static int sun8i_emac_set_syscon(struct sun8i_eth_pdata > > *pdata, > > > > reg = readl(priv->sysctl_reg); > > > > - reg = sun8i_emac_set_syscon_ephy(priv, reg); > > + reg = sun8i_emac_set_syscon_ephy(pdata, priv, reg); > > > > reg &= ~(SC_ETCS_MASK | SC_EPIT); > > if (priv->variant->support_rmii) > > @@ -859,6 +865,10 @@ static int sun8i_emac_eth_of_to_plat(struct udevice > > *dev) > > printf("%s: Invalid RX delay value %d\n", __func__, > > sun8i_pdata->rx_delay_ps); > > > > + sun8i_pdata->leds_active_low = > > + fdtdec_get_bool(gd->fdt_blob, dev_of_offset(dev), > > + "allwinner,leds-active-low"); > > + > > if (fdtdec_get_bool(gd->fdt_blob, dev_of_offset(dev), > > "snps,reset-active-low")) > > reset_flags |= GPIOD_ACTIVE_LOW; > -- Paul Kocialkowski, Free software developer - https://www.paulk.fr/ Independent contractor - sys-base - https://www.sys-base.io/ Contributor to fully free software support for selected hardware.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature