On 5/21/25 16:40, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/12/25 18:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Fix basic typo, missing t in security . No functional change .
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.va...@mailbox.org>
>> ---
>> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@foss.st.com>
>> Cc: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delau...@foss.st.com>
>> Cc: Sean Anderson <sean...@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Cc: uboot-st...@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp13.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp13.c 
>> b/drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp13.c
>> index 362dba10252..11dc40383a4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp13.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/stm32/clk-stm32mp13.c
>> @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static const struct stm32_div_cfg 
>> stm32mp13_dividers[LAST_DIV] = {
>>      DIV_CFG(DIV_ETH2PTP, RCC_ETH12CKSELR, 12, 4, 0, NULL),
>>  };
>>  
>> -struct clk_stm32_securiy {
>> +struct clk_stm32_security {
>>      u16     offset;
>>      u8      bit_idx;
>>  };
>> @@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ enum securit_clk {
>>              .bit_idx        = _bit_idx, \
>>      }
>>  
>> -static const struct clk_stm32_securiy stm32mp13_security[] = {
>> +static const struct clk_stm32_security stm32mp13_security[] = {
>>      SECF(SECF_LPTIM2, RCC_APB3SECSR, RCC_APB3SECSR_LPTIM2SECF),
>>      SECF(SECF_LPTIM3, RCC_APB3SECSR, RCC_APB3SECSR_LPTIM3SECF),
>>      SECF(SECF_VREF, RCC_APB3SECSR, RCC_APB3SECSR_VREFSECF),
>> @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ static int stm32mp13_check_security(void __iomem *base,
>>      int secured = 0;
>>  
>>      if (sec_id != SECF_NONE) {
>> -            const struct clk_stm32_securiy *secf;
>> +            const struct clk_stm32_security *secf;
>>  
>>              secf = &stm32mp13_security[sec_id];
>>              secured = !!(readl(base + secf->offset) & BIT(secf->bit_idx));
> Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@foss.st.com>
> 
> Thanks
> Patrice
Applied to u-boot-stm32/next

Thanks
Patrice

Reply via email to