On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Casey Connolly wrote: > > > On 6/17/25 10:26, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > On 16/06/2025 18:13, Casey Connolly wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > So I've been testing this a bit harder (really should have noticed > > > this sooner) and it turns out using binman makes things a whole lot > > > more complicated... > > > > > > Specifically, the new trogdor chromebook board doesn't need binman, > > > the U-Boot ELF is used directly since they have their own bootloader > > > beforehand. > > > > > > But since CONFIG_BINMAN can't be enabled in a defconfig and only > > > selected by some other Kconfig there isn't really a nice way to > > > handle this. The trogdor board doesn't add any Kconfigs of it's own > > > and doing something like > > > > > > depends on BINMAN if !CONFIG_SYS_COREBOOT > > > > > > would be a huge hack... > > > > Can't you change to depends on BINMAN if CONFIG_BINMAN_DTB ? > > No, since this creates a recursive dependency
Hmmm. Is there further symbol games we could do here? Perhaps we need another symbol around BINMAN functionality? I do need to re-read what you said above and think harder, sorry. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
