On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 4:33 PM Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> wrote: > But actually I wonder why Olimex has two different DTs for the > eMMC-less boards and the board with eMMC. > ...snip... > So I wonder if anyone wants to clean this up, because I think we would > only need the A20-OLinuXino-Lime2-eMMC_defconfig, > A20-OLinuXino_MICRO-eMMC_defconfig and a64-olinuxino_defconfig.
I had wondered the same, but expected I'd not understand. Looking just now, it sounds like it doesn't mix with the NAND variant (-n8G) well? https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/27dd9af6bc000ab21fdd41e58e3dddedba57ab92 It looks like the emmc DT has gotten slightly slimmer since being introduced. It doesn't seem the eMMC DT turns off any part of the NAND DT, so I might try to poke at this some. But I don't have a NAND version of the board to fully test. > > CONFIG_SPL=y > > +CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUNXI=y > > This needs to go further down below. After configuring for a board, run > "make savedefconfig", then compare the generated "defconfig" file > with your ..._defconfig version (or just copy ./defconfig over). Oh, right, the tooling would know the proper order. I just sorted it, but I forgot I had wondered earlier how things were ordered. Thanks for the explanation. Thanks for fixing it up.
