On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 03:28:22PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > Hi Abdelllatif > > On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 at 18:50, <abdellatif.elkhl...@arm.com> wrote: > > > > From: Abdellatif El Khlifi <abdellatif.elkhl...@arm.com> > > > > Implement set_image and get_image_info through RAW functions > > > > The implementation is done using efi_firmware_raw_set_image() > > and efi_firmware_get_image_info() > > > > Signed-off-by: Abdellatif El Khlifi <abdellatif.elkhl...@arm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Davidson kumaresan <davidson.kumare...@arm.com> > > Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> > > Cc: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org> > > Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > > Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org> > > Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.si...@amd.com> > > Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+rene...@mailbox.org> > > Cc: Casey Connolly <casey.conno...@linaro.org> > > Cc: Adriano Cordova <adria...@gmail.com> > > > > --- > > > > Changelog of changes: > > =========================== > > > > v2: > > > > * Following Heinrich comment: The changes at efi_firmware_raw_set_image() > > simplified by removing the "else" so it is clear we are just adding > > FWU_ARM_PSA > > support and skipping the use of DFU in case of FWU_ARM_PSA > > > > v1: > > > > * Add set_image and get_image_info support for FWU_ARM_PSA > > > > lib/efi_loader/efi_firmware.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_firmware.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_firmware.c > > index 75501e21557..38945b34e7b 100644 > > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_firmware.c > > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_firmware.c > > @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ > > * > > * Copyright (c) 2020 Linaro Limited > > * Author: AKASHI Takahiro > > + * > > + * Copyright 2025 Arm Limited and/or its affiliates > > <open-source-off...@arm.com> > > + * > > + * Authors: > > + * Abdellatif El Khlifi <abdellatif.elkhl...@arm.com> > > + * Davidson kumaresan <davidson.kumare...@arm.com> > > Copyright updates are usually done on significant contributions. I am > not this qualifies as such. > Tom is there a policy for that in U-Boot docs?
We don't have a formal policy, but indeed it's my understanding that copyright claims need to be for "significant contributions" as well. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature