On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 8/23/25 4:07 AM, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > I was planning to test this patch but the change being made is only > > > > > > applicable to Controller Versions: > > > > > > #define DEV_VER_NXP_V1 0x00024502 > > > > > > #define DEV_VER_TI_V1 0x00024509 > > > > > > and not to: > > > > > > #define DEV_VER_V2 0x0002450C > > > > > > #define DEV_VER_V3 0x0002450d > > > > > > > > > > > > Since I don't have an SoC and a Board with DEV_VER_TI_V1, I cannot > > > > > > test > > > > > > it. However, the change looks correct to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapa...@ti.com> > > > > > The change does indeed look correct. > > > > > > > > > > Do you know who might still have that board and could test ? (and > > > > > which > > > > > board/soc is that) ? > > > > > > > > None of the boards that I have worked with have a DEV_VER_TI_V1 version > > > > of the controller. I also tried to use the Linux device-tree to check if > > > > I could identify the SoC/board but I was unable to do so. > > > Do you know which SoC is V2 and V3 ? > > > > I spent more time on this and found out that J721E SR 1.0 has the > > controller with DEV_VER_TI_V1 version but other revisions of J721E as > > well as all of the following SoCs have DEV_VER_V3 version of the > > controller: > > AM64, AM68, AM69, J7200, J721S2, J722S, J742S2 and J784S4. > > > > I will try to find an SR 1.0 J721E SoC and test the patch on it and > > share the results here. > This is awesome, thank you !
I was able to get an SR 1.0 J721E SoC and also the J721E Common-Processor-Board for testing the patch. Enabling debug info in the cdns3/gadget.c driver, I see: cdns-usb3-peripheral usb@6000000: Device Controller version: 00024509 cdns-usb3-peripheral usb@6000000: USB Capabilities:: 09203324 cdns-usb3-peripheral usb@6000000: On-Chip memory cnfiguration: 00000c34 which confirms the Controller Version. However, the code changed by the current patch is only affecting the execution of code associated with Workaround 2 which is described in detail in the driver. I am summarizing it here for your reference: Issue: Controller for OUT endpoints has shared on-chip buffers for all incoming packets. The buffer acts as a FIFO, due to which, missing a DMA descriptor for one packet will block subsequent transfers/packets meant for other Endpoints that were queued. Workaround: If the Endpoint Status register indicates a Descriptor Miss, rearm the DMA transfer to complete the missed transfer. In order to test the patch, I used USBACM for STDIO/STDOUT to check if I could trigger the descriptor miss workaround. The command I ran was: setenv stdio usbacm; setenv stdout usbacm; /dev/ttyACM0 showed up on my PC and I was also able to access the U-Boot prompt via ACM0. While it is functional, I didn't see the code associated with the workaround being triggered. Reviewing the driver again, I identified that the workaround is being disabled very early on within "cdns3_wa2_gadget_ep_queue()" with the comment stating: * If transfer was queued before DESCMISS appear than we * can disable handling of DESCMISS interrupt. Driver assumes that it * can disable special treatment for this endpoint. Given the above, it doesn't seem easy to recreate the issue since I would have to trigger a descriptor miss event prior to the very first USB transfer for the Endpoint. Please let me know if you have any suggestions for speeding up testing. Regards, Siddharth.