> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Use correct LDO5 control registers for
> PCA9450
> 
> Hi Jaehoon,
> 
> Am 11.08.25 um 15:11 schrieb Frieder Schrempf:
> > From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schre...@kontron.de>
> >
> > This is a port for the following series in Linux, which is already
> > available in mainline:
> >
> >
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> patc
> > hwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-arm-
> kernel%2Fcover%2F20241218152842
> > .97483-1-
> frieder%40fris.de%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C51
> 6d
> >
> 65c0706c4d71292d08dde3b31d9d%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c
> 301635%7C0%7C
> >
> 0%7C638917080648452454%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB
> 0eU1hcGkiOnRydWU
> >
> sIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%
> 3D%3D%
> >
> 7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=neJx6WZU4iZWjSUcsnzOVQvFiaCTKLChE8srEx
> 6cwEQ%3D&rese
> > rved=0
> >
> > This aligns the PMIC driver with current Linux and allows to use
> > upstream devicetrees in U-Boot.
> >
> > Frieder Schrempf (6):
> >   Revert "pmic: pca9450: Add optional SD_VSEL GPIO for LDO5"
> >   pmic: pca9450: Fix enable register for LDO5
> >   pmic: pca9450: Fix control register for LDO5
> >   pmic: pca9450: Handle hardware with fixed SD_VSEL for LDO5
> >   arm: dts: imx8mp-data-modul-edm-sbc: Remove deprecated sd-
> vsel-gpios
> >   arm: dts: imx8mp-dhcom-som: Remove deprecated sd-vsel-gpios
> >
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx8mp-data-modul-edm-sbc.dts |  1 -
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx8mp-dhcom-som.dtsi         |  1 -
> >  drivers/power/pmic/pca9450.c               | 22 -------------
> >  drivers/power/regulator/pca9450.c          | 37
> ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> I saw that there are several patches on the mailing list for
> /drivers/power that have received no reply from a maintainer for
> several weeks (see [1]). I just wanted to make sure that you are aware
> of this and kindly ask to have a look.

I could help handle that via mmc tree, if Tom and you are ok.

Regards
Peng.

> 
> Thanks
> Frieder
> 
> [1]

Reply via email to