On 9/4/25 10:23 AM, Philip Oberfichtner wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 02:59:01PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 9/3/25 12:56 PM, Philip Oberfichtner wrote:
Simplify the depends-on logic for SPL_SIZE_LIMIT. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oberfichtner <p...@denx.de>
---
Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
index aa00669ba20..343299eed50 100644
--- a/Kconfig
+++ b/Kconfig
@@ -588,8 +588,8 @@ config HAS_SPL_SIZE_LIMIT
config SPL_SIZE_LIMIT
hex "Maximum size of SPL image in bytes"
depends on HAS_SPL_SIZE_LIMIT
- default 0x11000 if ARCH_MX6 && !MX6_OCRAM_256KB
default 0x31000 if ARCH_MX6 && MX6_OCRAM_256KB
+ default 0x11000 if ARCH_MX6
This makes it less obvious what the other case (!256 kiB SRAM SoCs) covers,
why is that an improvement ?
This was originally Heinrich's idea. I personally find it better this
way, but I won't argue about it.
Why do you send a patch which you cannot even argue is correct ?
Can you please find a consensus the two of you?
No, you should be able to clarify why this patch should be applied, do
not shift this onus to other participants.
