Hi I will add to my queue that I have now with patches, I have already prepared a branch
Michael On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 5:11 PM Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 05:58:48PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote: > > > > > > On 10/9/25 17:26, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 12:48:29PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> On 9/26/25 18:31, Tom Rini wrote: > > >>> The way that the NAND driver under DM_NAND_ATMEL is probed is by the > > >>> dummy memory driver controlled by ATMEL_EBI. Rather than require that > > >>> for NAND to work both be enabled, make NAND select ATMEL_EBI and do not > > >>> prompt for ATMEL_EBI as it only triggers the probe for NAND. > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]> > > >>> --- > > >>> Cc: Eugen Hristev <[email protected]> > > >>> Cc: Dario Binacchi <[email protected]> > > >>> Cc: Michael Trimarchi <[email protected]> > > >>> --- > > >>> drivers/memory/Kconfig | 2 +- > > >>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig | 1 + > > >>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >>> > > >>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/Kconfig b/drivers/memory/Kconfig > > >>> index eaee739c6aab..591d9d9c6569 100644 > > >>> --- a/drivers/memory/Kconfig > > >>> +++ b/drivers/memory/Kconfig > > >>> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ config MEMORY > > >>> For now this uclass has no methods yet. > > >>> > > >>> config ATMEL_EBI > > >>> - bool "Support for Atmel EBI" > > >>> + bool > > >>> help > > >>> Driver for Atmel EBI controller. This is a dummy > > >>> driver. Doesn't provide an access to EBI controller. Select > > >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig > > >>> index aa4bb2a0595c..f083113486ed 100644 > > >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig > > >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig > > >>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ config SYS_NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE > > >>> config DM_NAND_ATMEL > > >>> bool "Support Atmel NAND controller with DM support" > > >>> depends on ARCH_AT91 > > >> > > >> Which branch is this patch based on ? > > >> I have a conflict because this line ^^ is missing in master ("depends on > > >> ARCH_AT91") > > >> Is there another patch for that ? > > > > > > Ugh, yes, sorry, this patch depends on: > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > > > > > > > Then maybe Dario can pick this up together with the dependency patch ? > > Works for me, Dario? > > -- > Tom -- Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer M. +39 347 913 2170 [email protected] __________________________________ Amarula Solutions BV Joop Geesinkweg 125, 1114 AB, Amsterdam, NL T. +31 (0)85 111 9172 [email protected] www.amarulasolutions.com
