Ping. Any update on this? Com os melhores cumprimentos. / Best regards. Adriano Carvalho
On Sat, 6 Sept 2025 at 00:09, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 02:24:57AM +0100, Adriano Carvalho wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Sept 2025 at 02:14, Adriano Carvalho > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > [...] > > > So, in principle, we "only" need to replace all ".. image" with ".. > > > kernel-image" (65 occurrences / 17 files). However, I did that, and > > > got: > > > > > > sphinx.errors.ExtensionError: Handler <bound method > > > ImageCollector.process_doc of > > > <sphinx.environment.collectors.asset.ImageCollector object at > > > 0x79380051bbe0>> for event 'doctree-read' threw an exception > > > (exception: 'uri') > > > [...] > > > > Actually, the right approach is to use ".. kernel-figure" not ".. > > kernel-image". The latter is never used in the kernel. > > > > Using ".. kernel-figure" it works fine. The remaining patches are > > still required though. > > > > So, if you intend to remain aligned with Linux in the way the > > Documentation is built, instead of this patch a new one is required > > that replaces all instances of ".. image" with ".. kernel-image" (65 > > ccurrences / 17 files). > > > > Please let me know how you'd like me to proceed. > > We should switch to "kernel-image" and update our checkpatch.pl to > complain (and this might be acceptable to the linux kernel too, are > there instances of ".. image" ? I assume they too should be > kernel-image) so that we don't regress in easy to catch ways. > > And then yes, getting the correct non-zero SVG for the TI example needs > to be done. > > > Moreover, the infrastructure to build the Documentation is a bit > > behind that of Linux. Not a lot but quite a few changes. Should I try > > to issue a patch series to place U-Boot as in sync as possible with > > Linux? > > This is a question for Heinrich. Thanks again for digging here! > > -- > Tom
