Hi Quentin, Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 12:08, Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> > > SPL_FIT_FULL_CHECK currently shares its description and help text with > FIT_FULL_CHECK which is quite confusing, so let's specify this applies > to SPL. > > Fixes: 6f3c2d8aa5e6 ("image: Add an option to do a full check of the FIT") > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <[email protected]> > --- > boot/Kconfig | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/boot/Kconfig b/boot/Kconfig > index 9adb051400f..db114baa077 100644 > --- a/boot/Kconfig > +++ b/boot/Kconfig > @@ -193,13 +193,13 @@ config SPL_FIT_PRINT > Support printing the content of the fitImage in a verbose manner in > SPL. > > config SPL_FIT_FULL_CHECK > - bool "Do a full check of the FIT before using it" > + bool "Do a full check of the FIT within SPL before using it" > depends on SPL_FIT > help > - Enable this do a full check of the FIT to make sure it is valid. This > - helps to protect against carefully crafted FITs which take advantage > - of bugs or omissions in the code. This includes a bad structure, > - multiple root nodes and the like. > + Enable this do a full check of the FIT within SPL to make sure it is > + valid. This helps to protect against carefully crafted FITs which take > + advantage of bugs or omissions in the code. This includes a bad > + structure, multiple root nodes and the like. > > config SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE > bool "Enable signature verification of FIT firmware within SPL" > > --- > base-commit: 4cad9faf8d2887b8851f0ced5194ffbaa92ca71e > change-id: 20251029-spl-fit-full-check-desc-15d43348db55 > > Best regards, > -- > Quentin Schulz <[email protected]>
