On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 16:15:32 +0100 Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/4/25 11:45, Kory Maincent wrote: > > From: "Kory Maincent (TI.com)" <[email protected]> > > > > Add extension_overlay_addr description to the list of environment > > variables that can be useful during the standard boot. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent (TI.com) <[email protected]> > > --- > > doc/develop/bootstd/overview.rst | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/doc/develop/bootstd/overview.rst > > b/doc/develop/bootstd/overview.rst index 6cf3b48efca..d3dba2a3405 100644 > > --- a/doc/develop/bootstd/overview.rst > > +++ b/doc/develop/bootstd/overview.rst > > @@ -261,6 +261,9 @@ fdt_addr_r > > fdtoverlay_addr_r (needed if overlays are used) > > Address at which to load the overlay for the FDT, e.g. 0x02000000 > > > > +extension_overlay_addr (needed if extension is used) > > + Address at which to load the extension FDT overlays, e.g. 0x02000000 > > Requiring a predefined address instead of allocating memory via LMB is > not a good design. Didn't know this U-boot framework and there is no such uses in standard boot code. It would have been nice to review the series before it got merged I would have been glad to move it to a better design. Regards, -- Köry Maincent, Bootlin Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
