On Fri, Nov 07 2025, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 02:10:58PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > >> Implement a "part name" subcommand, mirroring the existing "part >> number" subcommand. >> >> In the discussion for v1 of that, it came up that there's a bit of >> inconsistency in how much and what one can assume to be initialized in >> 'struct disk_partition' after a successful call of one of the >> get_info* family of functions. The new patch 1/2 tries to consolidate >> that by making sure all ->get_info invocations go through a common >> helper that at least always initializes the string members. >> >> Rasmus Villemoes (2): >> disk/part.c: ensure strings in struct disk_partition are valid after >> successful get_info >> cmd/part.c: implement "part name" subcommand >> >> cmd/gpt.c | 4 +-- >> cmd/part.c | 16 ++++++++++- >> disk/part.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ >> doc/usage/cmd/part.rst | 13 +++++++++ >> include/part.h | 16 +++++++++++ >> 5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > This leads to some of the bootstd tests failing in CI, unfortunately.
Do you have a link? Also, how exactly should one run those bootstd tests? When I just build sandbox_defconfig and do 'ut bootstd', I get 130 failures, so I assume I need to do something extra. Rasmus
