On Friday 08 July 2011 07:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Aneesh V, > > In message<4e170601.1080...@ti.com> you wrote: >> >> Symlinks, copies are not involved in either case. My question was this: >> Where should something like 'nand_spl/nand_boot.c' go in the new >> framework? >> >> 1) spl/nand/nand_boot.c OR >> 2) drivers/nand/spl_nand_boot.c > > I have no strong preferences here... > >> (2) Helps in having: >> SPLOBJTREE := (OBJTREE)/spl >> >> where as with (1) we have: >> SPLOBJTREE := (OBJTREE)/spl/obj >> and with this nand_boot.o will be in >> (OBJTREE)/spl/obj/spl/nand/nand_boot.o ! >> >> To me (2) looks cleaner, and goes well with the idea of having all >> source files in the original source tree. > > Agreed. But maybe we can remove a redundant "nand" from the file > name, like this: > > drivers/nand/spl_boot.c > > ?
ok. Thanks. best regards, Aneesh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
